Pydantic v2 Internals: How StashObject Works Around BaseModel

This document explains two significant Pydantic v2 behaviors that required workarounds in StashObject, and the architectural decisions behind each fix. Both stem from the same root: Pydantic v2’s internal storage model has behaviors that are safe for typical models but dangerous for StashObject’s identity map + bidirectional relationship pattern. Relevant versions: Private attribute fix landed in v0.10.14. Shallow repr landed in v0.11.0b1.

Background: Pydantic v2’s Three Storage Dicts

Every Pydantic v2 BaseModel instance has three internal dictionaries:

Dict	Purpose	Rebuilt by `validate_assignment`?
`__dict__`	Declared model fields	YES — rebuilt on every field assignment
`__pydantic_extra__`	Extra fields (when `extra="allow"`)	Partially (extra fields may migrate here)
`__pydantic_private__`	`PrivateAttr` fields	NO — stable across all operations

StashObject uses validate_assignment=True (to run validators on field updates) and extra="allow" (to accept unknown GraphQL fields without crashing). This combination creates the conditions for both issues below.

Issue 1: Private Attributes Destroyed by `validate_assignment`

Fixed in: v0.10.14 Location: stash_graphql_client/types/base.py

The Problem

StashObject maintains three private attributes for internal bookkeeping:

Attribute	Purpose
`_snapshot`	Dirty tracking baseline — stores field values at last clean state
`_is_new`	Tracks whether object needs `create` vs `update` mutation
`_received_fields`	Tracks which fields came from GraphQL responses

Originally, these were stored via object.__setattr__(), which writes directly to __dict__. This works in plain Python objects, but in Pydantic v2 with validate_assignment=True, every field assignment rebuilds the entire __dict__ — silently destroying any non-field data stored there.

How It Manifests

The bug only appears on identity map cache hits, not on fresh object construction:

1. Gallery(id="123") constructed         → _snapshot stored in __dict__ (all UNSET)
2. Identity map cache hit                → fields merged via setattr()
   └─ Each setattr triggers validate_assignment → __dict__ rebuilt repeatedly
   └─ _snapshot migrates to __pydantic_extra__ (stale copy)
3. mark_clean() called                   → new _snapshot stored in __dict__ (real values)
4. gallery.title = "New"                 → validate_assignment rebuilds __dict__
   └─ New _snapshot LOST
   └─ getattr falls through to __pydantic_extra__ → finds stale all-UNSET snapshot
5. gallery.is_dirty()                    → ALL fields appear dirty (real vs UNSET)

This caused phantom dirty fields — every save() call would send unnecessary GraphQL mutations for fields that hadn’t actually changed.

Minimal Reproduction (Pre-Fix)

from stash_graphql_client.types.gallery import Gallery

gallery = Gallery(id="123")
setattr(gallery, "title", "Real Title")    # Simulate identity map merge
setattr(gallery, "organized", False)

gallery.mark_clean()
snap_id = id(gallery._snapshot)

gallery.title = "New Title"                # Triggers validate_assignment
assert id(gallery._snapshot) != snap_id    # FAILS — snapshot was replaced!
# gallery._snapshot now points to the stale model_post_init snapshot (all UNSET)

The Fix: Pydantic `PrivateAttr`

Convert all three attributes from object.__setattr__() storage to Pydantic PrivateAttr declarations:

from pydantic import PrivateAttr

class StashObject(BaseModel):
    # Stored in __pydantic_private__ — survives validate_assignment
    _snapshot: dict = PrivateAttr(default_factory=dict)
    _is_new: bool = PrivateAttr(default=False)
    _received_fields: set = PrivateAttr(default_factory=set)

PrivateAttr stores values in __pydantic_private__, which is never rebuilt by validate_assignment. All object.__setattr__() calls were replaced with direct assignment (self._attr = value), which Pydantic routes to __pydantic_private__ automatically.

Why It Only Appeared on Cache Hits

Objects constructed with all fields populated don’t exhibit this bug because:

model_post_init creates _snapshot with real values (not UNSET)
Even if __dict__ is rebuilt and _snapshot falls through to __pydantic_extra__, the stale copy also has real values
So current_value == snapshot_value holds true — dirty tracking appears to work

The bug only manifests when:

Object is constructed minimally (e.g., nested fragment with just id)
Fields are populated via setattr() (identity map merge path)
model_post_init snapshot has UNSET for all fields
mark_clean() creates new snapshot with real values
Next field assignment rebuilds __dict__, losing the snapshot
Fallback finds the stale all-UNSET snapshot from step 3

This is the exact sequence that occurs in production when find_scenes() or find_galleries() returns objects already in the identity map cache.

Key Lesson

Never use object.__setattr__() to store state on Pydantic v2 models with validate_assignment=True. Use PrivateAttr instead — it uses __pydantic_private__, the only dict that is guaranteed stable across all Pydantic operations.

Issue 2: Recursive `repr` Exponential Blowup

Fixed in: v0.11.0b1 Location: stash_graphql_client/types/base.py, all entity type files

The Problem

Pydantic v2’s default BaseModel.__repr__() recursively renders every field of every nested model. With StashObject’s bidirectional relationships, this walks the entire object graph:

Gallery.performers → [Performer] → .scenes → [Scene] → .performers → [Performer] ...
                                  → .groups → [Group] → ...
Gallery.scenes     → [Scene]     → .galleries → [Gallery] → ...

Pydantic’s cycle detection prevents infinite recursion, but the traversal fans out exponentially across non-cyclic paths.

Real-World Impact

A downstream consumer called repr() on changed field values before saving. On a dataset with ~3,000 posts (~1,200 scenes, ~1,800 galleries):

Metric	Value
Per-gallery `repr()` cost	~2.2 seconds (for `performers` field alone)
Cost growth	Worsens as identity map accumulates entities
Total overhead	~110 minutes of CPU time generating strings immediately truncated to 80 chars
Memory	Multi-MB transient string allocations per call, contributing to OOM kills

Any consumer calling repr() — logging, debugging, REPL, pytest assertion output — hits the same problem.

The Fix: Two-Tier Shallow Repr

StashObject now has two repr methods:

`_short_repr()` — Compact Nested Representation

Used when an object appears inside another object’s repr. Collects all set+non-None fields from the __short_repr_fields__ tuple:

def _short_repr(self) -> str:
    parts: list[str] = []
    for field in self.__short_repr_fields__:
        val = getattr(self, field, UNSET)
        if is_set(val) and val is not None:
            parts.append(f"{field}={val!r}")
    if not parts:
        return f"{self.__type_name__}(id={self.id!r})"
    return f"{self.__type_name__}({', '.join(parts)})"

If no fields match, falls back to TypeName(id='...'). Multi-field tuples show all matching fields — e.g., __short_repr_fields__ = ("id", "name") produces Performer(id='123', name='Jane'). Each entity subclass declares which fields to include:

Type	`__short_repr_fields__`	Example
Performer	`("name",)`	`Performer(name='Jane')`
Scene	`("title",)`	`Scene(title='Test Scene')`
Tag	`("name",)`	`Tag(name='tag 1')`
Studio	`("name",)`	`Studio(name='Acme')`
Gallery	`("title",)`	`Gallery(title='2024 Post')`
Group	`("name",)`	`Group(name='Series 1')`
Image	`("title",)`	`Image(title='Photo')`
VideoFile	`("basename",)`	`VideoFile(basename='clip.mp4')`
Folder	`("path",)`	`Folder(path='/media/videos')`

Fallback: if label field is UNSET or None, falls back to TypeName(id='123').

`repr()` — Full Representation

Shows all non-UNSET model fields (not just tracked fields), with relationship fields rendered shallowly:

def __repr__(self) -> str:
    parts: list[str] = [f"id={self.id!r}"]

    for field_name in sorted(self.__class__.model_fields):
        if field_name == "id":
            continue
        val = getattr(self, field_name, UNSET)
        if not is_set(val):
            continue

        if isinstance(val, StashObject):
            parts.append(f"{field_name}={val._short_repr()}")
        elif isinstance(val, list) and val and isinstance(val[0], StashObject):
            limit = self._SHORT_REPR_LIST_LIMIT  # default: 2
            items = [item._short_repr() for item in val[:limit]]
            suffix = f", ..{len(val) - limit} more" if len(val) > limit else ""
            parts.append(f"{field_name}=[{', '.join(items)}{suffix}]")
        else:
            r = repr(val)
            if len(r) > 200:
                r = r[:197] + "..."
            parts.append(f"{field_name}={r}")

    return f"{self.__type_name__}({', '.join(parts)})"

Example Output

Before (Pydantic default — truncated, actual output is megabytes):

Performer(id='abc123', name='Jane', alias_list=['JD'], tags=[Tag(id='t1', name='blonde',
parents=[Tag(id='t2', name='hair', parents=[...], children=[Tag(id='t1', ...)])],
children=[...])], scenes=[Scene(id='s1', title='...', performers=[Performer(id='abc123',
name='Jane', alias_list=['JD'], tags=[...], scenes=[Scene(id='s2', ...
... (continues for megabytes)

After (shallow repr):

Performer(id='abc123', alias_list=['JD'], favorite=False, name='Jane',
  scenes=[Scene(title='S1'), Scene(title='S2'), ..1198 more],
  tags=[Tag(name='blonde'), Tag(name='brunette'), ..3 more])

Design Decisions

Why show all model fields, not just tracked fields? The initial proposal showed only __tracked_fields__, but the final implementation shows all non-UNSET model fields. This provides more complete debugging information — fields like rating100, scene_count, and date are useful in repr output even though they aren’t tracked for dirty checking. Why sorted() on field names? Deterministic output across runs. Without sorting, dict iteration order could vary, making log diffs and test assertions unreliable. Why self.__class__.model_fields instead of self.model_fields? Pydantic v2.11 deprecated instance-level model_fields access. Using the class-level accessor avoids deprecation warnings. Why no dirty indicator (* suffix)? The original proposal included "*" when is_dirty() returns True. This was removed because is_dirty() does field-by-field comparison including list traversal — too much work for a __repr__ method that might be called frequently in logging or debugging contexts. A repr should be fast and side-effect-free. Why not use __repr_args__ (Pydantic’s hook)? Pydantic v2’s __repr_args__ returns (field_name, value) tuples that Pydantic then repr()s recursively. There’s no way to control relationship rendering at that level — the only solution is to override __repr__ entirely. Why truncate scalars at 200 characters (not 60)? Fields like details can contain multi-paragraph text. The initial proposal used 60 chars, but this was too aggressive — URLs, file paths, and aliases are commonly 80-150 chars. 200 chars provides a better balance. Why first 2 items in list repr (not count-only)? Showing tags=[5 Tag] is compact but loses information. Showing tags=[Tag(name='blonde'), Tag(name='brunette'), ..3 more] gives immediate identification of the first two items, which is usually enough to understand the relationship contents without expanding the full list. What about __str__? Left as Pydantic’s default (which delegates to __repr__). This means str(obj), f"{obj}", and print(obj) all use the shallow repr — there’s no use case where a consumer wants the multi-MB recursive output.

The Common Thread

Both issues stem from Pydantic v2’s BaseModel being designed for simple data containers, not for objects with:

Identity map caching — objects are mutated after construction via setattr()
Bidirectional relationships — objects reference each other (Scene→Performer→Scene)
Internal bookkeeping state — private attributes that must survive field mutations

StashObject works within Pydantic v2’s constraints by:

Using __pydantic_private__ (via PrivateAttr) for internal state that must be stable
Overriding __repr__ to prevent recursive traversal of the relationship graph
Using __class__.model_fields for introspection to avoid deprecated instance access
Keeping validate_assignment=True for field validation while protecting private state from its dict-rebuilding side effect

​Background: Pydantic v2’s Three Storage Dicts

​Issue 1: Private Attributes Destroyed by validate_assignment

​The Problem

​How It Manifests

​Minimal Reproduction (Pre-Fix)

​The Fix: Pydantic PrivateAttr

​Why It Only Appeared on Cache Hits

​Key Lesson

​Issue 2: Recursive __repr__ Exponential Blowup

​The Problem

​Real-World Impact

​The Fix: Two-Tier Shallow Repr

​_short_repr() — Compact Nested Representation

​__repr__() — Full Representation

​Example Output

​Design Decisions

​The Common Thread

Background: Pydantic v2’s Three Storage Dicts

Issue 1: Private Attributes Destroyed by `validate_assignment`

The Problem

How It Manifests

Minimal Reproduction (Pre-Fix)

The Fix: Pydantic `PrivateAttr`

Why It Only Appeared on Cache Hits

Key Lesson

Issue 2: Recursive `repr` Exponential Blowup

The Problem

Real-World Impact

The Fix: Two-Tier Shallow Repr

`_short_repr()` — Compact Nested Representation

`repr()` — Full Representation

Example Output

Design Decisions

The Common Thread